The easiest way to put up an Internet radio station is with Linux. And even though the record industry is throttling stations in the U.S., it's still a big world with infinite dialwidth. With wi-fi growing like a rogue weed, the market ecosystem is calling forth a new breed of Linux-based portable radios. Wanna make one?
Okay, so the record industry and the feds are committing industrial genocide on U.S.-based Internet radio (with a few exceptions that include popular public radio stations like WUNC and KUOW). But there are plenty of places in the world where webcasting is still legal, and nobody's stopping you from listening.
So let's stop for a moment and ponder the opportunities here.
On the one hand, the easiest way to put up an Internet radio station is with Linux and other open source tools. In fact, it says here that Bill Goldsmith of Radio Paradise is making his hacks available for anybody who wants them. For background on how very cool this is, see The Promise of Radio Paradise: An Open-Source Challenge to Commercial Radio.
The client side is another matter.
One reason Internet radio is still at the early adopter stage (or earlier: more like hunter-gatherer) is that computers are the only available receivers. Kerbango made a run at pioneering the Internet radio receiver business a couple years back ; but 3Com bought and killed them ($81 million for nothing). Penguin Radio came along around the same time, and is still very much in business. Their radio look cool, but still aren't out yet.
Yet the advent of wi-fi begs radios. Wouldn't it be cool to have a portable radio, or a car radio, that picked up Web stations over wi-fi or a wired DHCP connection to the Net? Hey, why not?
Here's what Bill Goldsmith said when I asked him about the prospects:
WiFi Internet Radio? Gotta love it! I think that the kind of ad-hoc WiFi networks that are starting to pop up could be the biggest thing since Linux - a total end run around the big-money wireless initiatives. No reputable manufacturer is about to put out a product that depends on a network run for the hell of it by a bunch of hackers in their spare time - just like a few years ago no reputable company would have had anything to do with an operating system written by a bunch of hackers in their spare time. Smells like an opportunity to me.
Then I pointed him to zradio, a piece of $10 shareware that turns your LInux-based Sharp Zaurus into an Internet radio receiver. His reply:
Well that is just the coolest thing... I could easily write a web app for that screen size that would let me control the station as well as listen to it - anywhere with WiFi access. How cool is *that*?
But what we need now is a radio. Not a computer or a PDA. Just a radio. A dedicated device. Something anybody could use.
It's silly to wait for the consumer electronics cartel to make one. Their Hollywood connections probably forbid it outright, but the bigger reason is production economics. They don't make anything unless it risks selling huge numbers.
Many years ago I did a lot of work with Hitachi Semiconductor, where I often heard the expression, "10-10-10." No, it wasn't fertilizer. It stood for an unspoken policy that was common throughout the semiconductor industry: the big consumer electronics component producers wouldn't bother to ramp up production on a new microprocessor if it wasn't going to be over 10 MIPS, under 10 dollars and ready to sell at least 10 million units. That's why the Hitachi SuperH would never have been available as a GNU/Linux development target if the company hadn't sold piles of early versions to companies like Sega and Nissan.
So we have to roll our own. Hey, is it really that hard? We don't need something beautiful, just something functional. The innards could consist of a low-power board running Linux, an analog board for audio, some backplane for USB, Ethernet and PCMCIA ... Or just with wi-fi and nothing else.
We have to think inventively here. Also cheap. Here's Don Marti:
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to an Internet radio as a Linux development project is the sheer simplicity and lack of challenge.
Put a single-board computer and some kind of networking hardware in a box with an amplifier and power supply. Put a knob on the front for power and volume, and another knob to switch among stations. Let the user build a station preset list on a web site, and configure the radio to download it periodically. There's nothing here that ten thousand people couldn't do in their basements given a few spare weekends, a soldering iron, and an FTP client.
But that means VC-funder companies looking for a big score won't be able to patent anything, and individuals looking for a fun hobby project would be done too soon. Who will take up the challenge of doing such an "obvious" project, but with human factors that will make people want put it in their living rooms and bedrooms?
Who will resist the temptation to clutter the radio with alphanumeric displays people don't understand and buttons they don't press? Is it time to pitch Tom DeVesto about doing a net version of the Henry Kloss Model One?
You can forget venture capital in any case. Here's PenguinRadio CEO Andrew Leyden:
Raising new funding for a "device" like this is just impossible in this economy, even though the demand for such a thing is as hot as ever (people e-mail me every week pleading for things like this, it just pains me I can't deliver it now)...
It's really a shame. The elements are falling into place (broadband, home networking) but the march of the big boys is really wrecking the net in many regards (RIAA, CARP, etc). Our goal was a device that could deliver everything from around the world to the local guy in his basement. Now that the efforts are underway to make Internet Radio as stale as over the air radio, it does make us scratch our heads and ask should PenguinRadio even play a part in the rise of musical mediocrity?
That last question is a rhetorical one, since he's pressing ahead with development anyway.
And what about the rest of us? Just because the going got tough doesn't mean the tough should stop going.
Seems to us there's an opportunity here. What do the rest of you think?
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal.